For roughly the same price, they have a much better reputation for sounding good. If you already have them, I would say that they would serve your purpose fairly well. Be mindful that “frequency response” gives no indication of cabinet resonance – this is what will complicate your GBF and can only be known with some acoustic testing. I use the jrxs, s, and ms on a regular basis. Prepare for a chorus of this but take a look into the Yamaha SM 12V’s.
|Date Added:||17 June 2018|
|File Size:||59.47 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Prepare for a chorus of this but take a look into the Yamaha SM 12V’s.
The audiences that I’m playing to are mostly people who are attending a friends birthday party or drunk clubbers. If you already have them, I would say that they would serve your purpose fairly well. Hi I’m new to this group so Jrx121m hope I’m posting in the right place here. Give the Yamaha club series a listen. I quite fancy the JRXM’s because of the size and weight compared to the s. If anyone can tell me any of their experiences with any of these speakers or any others speakker the same price range I’d really appreciate your help.
So, I need to get some more speakers so I can carry on with the mobile DJing. I’ve taken a booking for a temporary installation of all of the aforementioned JBL speakers and subs that starts in a few weeks and lasts for around 2 months. Clarity, overall sound quality. Can you do better?
I use a speeaker of the “Sound Factor” versions of these de-rat furred for a number of things – very successfully: For roughly the same price, they have a much better reputation for sounding good. The frequency response graph looks similar except the s go about 20Hz lower, but this shouldn’t be a problem if I’m using the subs, should it?
I use the jrxs, s, and ms on a regular basis. Apart spaeker the obvious better looks and higher power handling, what else would you say is greatly improved?
Read times Paul Hill Jr.
JBL JRXM 12″ W Speaker Cabinet
The jrx are known for not being the best sounding, but I have never really had any complaints. Tops for drum fill FOH on speech only gigs poles FOH on small bar gigs – when there is no time or inclination to do much more than vocals poles Some “cabaret” type things.
They will work as mains, but are not optimum. Be mindful that “frequency response” gives no indication of cabinet resonance – this is what will complicate your GBF and can only be known with some acoustic testing.
Thanks for your reply. Monitor channel 5 and 6. That said, they are wedges and are more resonant than I prefer – but they are workable. Nick Direnzi Newbie Offline Posts: The full list is here if anyone’s interested http: There is always spaeker “better.
JRX M’s sound fine, but there are Monitors for the same price or a little more. Paul Hill wrote on Tue, 22 May I’ll check out the Yamaha’s but for now it sounds like the s might be a good bet for me. For what they are, the jrx speakers jbo the job done and although jjrx112m might disagree, I have abused the crap out of some of them and never had any problems. And if anyone’s interested and still reading I’d be happy to post my findings about all of my equipment.
They are made to be used as both monitors and mains and you will find them to sound a decent bit better than your JRX’s!
JBL JRX112M 12″ Two-way 250 Watt Stage Monitor JRX 112m
I’m also really happy with the JRX’s that I have at the moment. I think they are outstanding for the very low price. Its just one option, there are others out there.